Showing posts with label Movie Minute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Minute. Show all posts

A Thunder Matt Movie Minute

April 17, 2009 | Comments (0) | by Chaim Witz

Adventureland

In Theatres Now

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: A comedy set in the summer of 1987 and centered around a recent college grad (Jesse Eisenberg) who takes a nowhere job at his local amusement park, only to find it's the perfect course to get him prepared for the real world.

Review: Let's get this out of the way upfront. This movie is not Superbad, despite what the marketing geniuses may lead you to believe. If you go in expecting a ball-punching laugh riot with lots of hand drawn penises and bodily fluids (although there is a Jewfro), you may dismiss this movie out of hand, like America did with Jessica Simpson's hotly anticipated (according to Joe Simpson and Tony Romo) country album. Too subtle for the Fast N Furious set and too cutesy for the pretentious lamb shank nibblers, this movie has thus far failed to find an audience, which is a shame.

Always a sucker for a good coming of age story (Say Anything, Dazed and Confused and yes, throw your rotten produce at me, but I loved Garden State. Heck, I even dug Nick and Norah.), this movie certainly fits the bill and wears it well. Set to a great 80's soundtrack (no real obvious picks here), what it lacks in LOLs it makes up for in heart and honest performances without a false note. Call me a romantic, call me a pansy, just don't call me late for dinner. Okay, that was a really stupid joke. If you hated that joke, you'll love Adventureland. How's that for tag line?

Bottom line: If you're a child of the 80's, have ever had a crappy job, are a sissy like me and enjoy the dulcet sounds of 80's era Lou Reed and Bowie, this movie is probably for you. If not, rent the Fast and Furious trilogy and continue to incorporate the letter 'z' onto the end of all your plurals.

Thunder Matt Rating: 4 perms out of 5


State of Play


IMBD Cribbed Synopsis: A team of investigative reporters work alongside a police detective to try to solve the murder of a congressman's mistress.

In Theatres: Friday, April 17

Review: This movie is a bit of a throwback in many ways. It involves a newspaper reporter (they still make those?), played by Russell Crowe, investigating the murder of a congressman's (Ben Affleck, who also happens to be one of his best friends) mistress, filmed in true 'who done it' fashion, with enough twists and turns to make M Night Shyamalan's wiener fall off.

There is a blue collar, old-school thriller feel to the proceedings that you'll feel like you've seen before, but it's done so expertly and with such a great cast (Helen Mirren, Robin Wright Penn, Jeff Daniels, the heartbreakingly adorable Rachel McAdams and Jason Bateman in a comic relief role - natch) that you'll forgive a few loopholes that arise along the way. This movie may the last of it's kind in that the director (Kevin McDonald - The Last King of Scotland) explores the inner workings of a newspaper (and thusly, it's struggles to adapt to the Internet world) and the role of investigative reporting; the way that papers are crumbling by the hour, this film might be used to show future journalism classes when the question arises, 'What is a newspaper'?

The performances here are all solid, with Crowe giving a surprisingly subdued (yet effective) turn and Helen Mirren is perfect as the obligatory ball-busting editor. Enough intrigue, political corruption and corporate crime to keep you thinking mixed with just the right amount of people getting blasted to keep you from getting bored. Plus that Rachel McAdams is just so damn cute.

Thunder Matt Rating: 3.5 Wait, What Just Happened?s Out of 5

Thunder Matt Movie Minute: Watchmen

March 05, 2009 | Comments (0) | by Chaim Witz

For this review, I have enlisted the help of resident comic nerd Wolter to help me deconstruct this year's most anticipated film. I just finished reading the novel about a week ago and that was the first 'graphic novel' that I've ever read, having not read an actual comic since I used to devour 'Richie Rich' comics as a pre-pubescent lad (no wonder I'm so pretentious). Wolter on the other hand, has intimate knowledge of the subject matter. And by intimate, I mean he has had sex with the novel. Don't knock it til you try it. We'll spare you the details of the trying to explain the plot. You can do that legwork yourself.


IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: "Watchmen" is set in an alternate 1985 America in which costumed superheroes are part of the fabric of everyday society, and the "Doomsday Clock" - which charts the USA's tension with the Soviet Union - is permanently set at five minutes to midnight. When one of his former colleagues is murdered, the washed up but no less determined masked vigilante Rorschach sets out to uncover a plot to kill and discredit all past and present superheroes. As he reconnects with his former crime-fighting legion - a ragtag group of retired superheroes, only one of whom has true powers - Rorschach glimpses a wide-ranging and disturbing conspiracy with links to their shared past and catastrophic consequences for the future. Their mission is to watch over humanity... but who is watching the Watchmen?

Review

Chaim: Watchmen comes to us as the most anticipated comic/graphic novel since Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties. It's length is Lord of the Rings-esque, it's violence stylized yet brutal and it's scope is sometimes too complex for it's own good and for the mere mortals trying to take it all in.

For those who are unfamiliar with the dark noir world of graphic novel that the movie is based upon (Voted one of Time Magazine's '100 Greatest Novels of All Time') the best way I could describe it would be if George Orwell's book 1984 made love to the movie Sin City and had a child, but then gave it up for adoption to David Lynch and Hunter S. Thompson, that child would grow up to be Watchmen. Sound a bit complex and slightly disturbing? Welcome to the show.

Wolter, you can probably speak to this better than I can, but I did feel that for the most part, the movie stayed very true to the novel, which may please the die hards, but alienate the casual viewer. Gone are the pirate ship sub-story and the news stand guy, and the ending is tweaked a bit for mass consumption, but other than that and a few other slight omissions, the book seemed to be the storyboard for the movie.

Wolter: I agree. In fact, last night I picked Watchmen off the shelf and started sort of half-rereading it. It's amazing how much was directly from it (at least in the first 30 minutes of the movie). Rorschach's diaries are pretty much identical, even down to what's being shown as he talks. And a lot of the signs and graffiti were pretty much directly transferred. It's pretty clear that the original source panels were converted directly into storyboards for much of the film.

Of course, such reverence could easily make the film turgid and hard to follow (which, for all I know it is - I really need to rewatch it now that I have "OHMYGOD I'M WATCHING THE WATCHMEN" out of my system). But pretty much all of the major plot changes and omissions worked for me. In fact, I think the changed ending is actually a more plausible plot device, and works better in almost every way. Oh, and I support Sally Jupiter aging into a GILF...but I'm shallow that way.

I did love the "tip of the cap" to the fans by including a brief view of the "newstand guy" and the "comics reader" near the end. Sort of a "yeah, we had to cut the Black Freighter, but you know it was still going on, fanboys."

Another observation: the score was a bold and largely successful decision. The use of mostly period songs (with a smattering of 60s songs) and a sort of 80s-movie style guitar/synth highlighting (is that the right term? I suspect not) really worked for me. It really put the movie in the proper (alternate) time frame.

I think this movie may do poorly later in the run, as it's definitely not The Dark Knight, Iron Man or Spider-Man. I'm not 100% sure how Snyder got the budget to make what has always been a niche read comic meta text ruminating on such subjects as the comics industry and the way the American Dream flirts with fascism.

Chaim: The soundtrack was ballsy, but yeah, it worked. Putting Hendrix, Dylan, Simon & Garfunkel and Leonard Cohen in key spots could have really been a disaster, but I thought it worked.

Do you think that someone that sees the film without any preconceived notions might see it as a bit cold and detached though? I will say that I think that it's easier to get away with that type of heavy tone in a book than on film.

Wolter: I think it's possible. I told my girlfriend (in as spoiler-free a manner as possible) that if I didn't know how his character sees the world from the get-go, I might have felt that Billy Crudup was way too flat and detached in his line reads.

The whole trick of the original graphic novel is that none of the characters are fully likable at all times (except for maybe Hollis Mason). Depending on the point in the story, I have felt sympathy with and revulsion regarding almost every character's morals and behavior.

An example: in many ways, Rorschach is the most heroic character of all, and the only one who stays true to his ideals - and he's actually an unlikable psychopath that is more or less a straight caricature of the Ayn Randian Objectivism and moral certitude of comics legend Steve Ditko (whose Question is the inspiration for his character). In both the original source and the movie, he ends up brutally torturing more-or-less innocent people to get the information he needs - and he is far more obsessed with retribution than genuine justice.

And now an aside: one of the more disturbing experiences at the screening was hearing all the comics geeks cheering loudly in response to some of Rorschach's more psychotic excesses (particularly in the prison). There's always been a bit of that mindset in vigilante heroes anyway, but the amount of laughter at the fate of the relatively defenseless and (at that point essentially impotent) ringleader was somewhat chilling. And somewhat more chilling: I found myself almost wanting to laugh and cheer along with them - which I believe was the result Moore and Snyder were consciously aiming for.

To get back to the original question: the Watchmen graphic novel rewards careful rereading with insights, and I suspect this film does the same with careful rewatching. However, I'm not 100% sure if the film will attract rewatching in people who weren't already fans. I would like to see it again, but I suspect my views are not those of the average moviegoer.

Chaim: I love that you casually work into the conversation "...the Ayn Randian Objectivism and moral certitude of comics legend Steve Ditko..." That's some Grade A geek speak right there.

My summary for the uninitiated would be this: If you like your comic book characters ambiguous, your violence extreme, your nudity gratuitous, your symbolism deep, your penises blue, your endings somber and your humor dark, this might be the movie for you. Or it might not.

Rating: 3.5 Blue Penises Out of 5

Wolter: For the initiated: If you can wait for the special DVD to see Tales of the Black Freighter, can accept that the original ending would never have made sense on the big screen (heck, be honest, you had to reread the comic just to understand it in the first place), don't have any cockamamie theories about Dr. Manhattan's penis size or circumcision status being symbolic, and can get over the gratuitous freeze-frames and slo-mo sequences during the fights, you probably will enjoy this movie. Very little was added that wasn't in the original, and it's still dense even after the judicious cuts were made. I did think the fight choreography (and to some extent the dreaded FREEZE FRAME AND SLOW MOTION) was out of place. But even if it falls flat on some levels (Nixon looks goofy as hell. There, I said it), remember how hard it is to even be in the ballpark of the source material. And how often will you have the chance to see a live action comics movie that is so visually faithful to the source material?

Honestly, I don't know if this movie is successful on it's own terms or not, but seeing Dr. Manhattan's crystal sanctuary rise up out of the soil of Mars on the big screen is probably worth your greasy, Dorito-stained money by itself. Watch it. You paid good money to see X-Men 3, and this is definitely better than that festering, amoral, crapfest. And, oddly, a lot more fun...

Rating: 4 Sadistic Killings Out of 5 (subject to change)

A Thunder Matt Movie Minute

September 25, 2008 | Comments (0) | by Chaim Witz

Lots of 'just ok' movies to get to, so let's get right to it:

Burn After Reading


IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: A disk containing the memoirs of a CIA agent ends up in the hands of two unscrupulous gym employees who attempt to sell it.

Review: Fresh off the success of their 'dick in the dirt' masterpiece No Country For Old Men, the Coen Brothers return to their roots with a whimsical spy farce that stars, among others, everyone who has ever been named People Magazine's 'Sexiest Man Alive'*. One might expect me to throw out a bunch of interchangeable superlatives (Coen Brothers, Skeet Skeet!) in an effort to live up to my carefully crafted 'pretentious bastard' persona. Unfortunately, if I were to do that I would be lying to our readers (all 4 of you that don't already write for the site) and dammit if I don't have principles.

BAF is an enjoyable enough, if fairly slight film that speeds through its 90 minute run time like Daft Funk inhaling a Carl's Jr. Value Meal. It can't decide if it wants to be The Big Lebowski or Fargo and in the end, achieves neither.

You can't fault the actors, who are all in top form here. You have Brad Pitt chewing scenery like a gay roadrunner, George Clooney sweating and eating Chinese food, John Malkovich delivering his lines (most of which consist of him yelling, 'What the fuck?') with the zest of someone half his age and J.K. Simmons stealing scenes as if no one told him that they weren't filming Juno anymore.

Unfortunately the story can't live up to the heft of the acting. That said, it's still better than 90% of your other cinematic options. It's like driving off the lot in a bright red Ferrri only to find out that it has the engine of a Prius. Oh well, at least you'll save on gas.

Thunder Matt Rating: 3.5 'What the Fucks' Out of 5

*Except me.

Choke

Release Date: September 26

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: A sex-addicted con-man pays for his mother's hospital bills by playing on the sympathies of those who rescue him from choking to death.

Review: Based on the Chuck Palahniuk ('Fight Club') book of the same name, Choke is a naughty little minx, choc full of nudity, anal beads, dementia and Godspeak. Kind of like Poker Night at The Hundley's house.

This film isn't for the faint of heart or easily offended (then again, if you're a reader of this site, you probably don't fall into that category) and is probably an acquired taste, but I imagine that if you've read the book (or any Chuck P books for that matter) you know what you're getting into. It's never funny enough or poignant enough to qualify as a 'must see', but there are worse ways to spend 90 minutes than to watch Sam Rockwell tear into this sex-addled, avant garde morality play set to Radiohead.*

Thunder Matt Rating: 3 Anal Beads Out of 5

*Bonus point for our Iowa readers: Maple Lanes in Waterloo gets a shout out.

Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist


Release Date: October 3

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: High school student Nick O'Leary, member of the Queercore band The Jerk Offs, meets college-bound Norah Silverberg and she asks him to be her boyfriend for five minutes.

Review: Taking place over the course of one wild night in the Big Apple, Nick and Nora follows the escapades of Nick (Michael Cera) and Nora (Kat Dennings) along with their friends, as they traipse from one venue to the next, looking for a secret show by their favorite band, Fluffy. Nick has just had his heart broken and Nora is in a relationship of convenience when fate throws them together. Teen shenanigans ensue.

N&N isn't reinventing the wheel by any means. It's pretty standard teen angst fare, propped up by the stellar performances of the two leads, the always great Cera and the surprisingly charming Dennings. Michael Cera channels...well, Michael Cera, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it's Dennings that really steals the show.

That said, like any angsty, pubescent teen, this movie is hairy in weird places and not without a few skin blemishes. All of the teen movie cliches and archtypes are in abundance. The bitchy, cheerleader ex-girlfriend. The douchebag ex-boyfriend. The zany best friends. The ending is predictable at best and way too saccharine sweet for it's own good. It will no doubt try to cater to the Juno crowd, but lacks any of the depth that made it's older sister a breakout hit.

In then end, it's cute, it's trite and it's perfectly watchable. Why reinvent the wheel if the one that you have works just fine?

Thunder Matt Rating: 3 Dry Humps Out of 5


Lightning Round

Righteous Kill

Review: What waste. You finally get the band back together (Pacino and DeNiro) only to have them sing a capella, with no instruments. The script feels like it was written for a CSI spinoff (CSI: Hoo-Ah!),with a plot twist so obvious that even the Houston Astros (dumb) could probably figure it out from the trailer. Oddly, Pacino (and his hair) gives his most understated performance in years, save for the end, when he destroys all the goodwill that he had just built up. The one thing that keeps things interesting is the subplot about Carla Gugino (hot) being into rough sex; although that probably would have worked out better in Choke.

Thunder Matt Rating: 2 Shells of Their Former Selves Out of 5

Tropic Thunder

Review: Rent it for Downey Jr, but keep your expectations in check. For every funny Downey riff, fake movie trailer (they're great) or oddly amusing 'Tom Cruise in a fat suit, cursing and dancing to Ludacris' moment, you have to sit through a one-joke Jack Black character and some painfully unfunny Ben Stiller scenes, which derail any momentum faster than a Downey relapse.

Thunder Matt Rating: 2.5 Judd Apatows out of 5


CD Roundup

Sure, this is a movie column, but what the hell? Here are a few quick thoughts on some recent releases:

Metallica, Death Magnetic - I didn't start listening to Metallica until the Black Album, so I'm not too familiar with their 'old school' sound, but this album is pretty solid, if not utterly exhausting. Most of the songs clock in at Freebird-esque lengths and oddly, Kirk Hammet's guitar solos are usually more catchy than anything in the choruses. Sometimes it sounds like they're trying too hard and other times they hit it out of the park. Best enjoyed in small spurts, like me in bed. Funk did a more in depth review. 3 Stars Out of 5
Download: "That Was Just Your Life", "All Nightmare Long"; Skip: "The Unforgiven III"

Extreme, Saudades de Rock - Wow, remember these guys? They were the ones that crooned 'More Than Words' over the loudspeakers at your junior high dance when you got your first boner. They're known for that song (and having the lead singer who helmed the disastrous 3rd incarnation of Van Halen), but really have always really been a sort of weird hard rock/funk/prog rock hybrid, and their guitarist Nuno Bettencourt is actually pretty revered amongst guitar players (aka, 'big in Japan!'). Their latest effort, which I simply refer to as 'Sausages of Rock' is a solid effort filled with chunky guitar riffs, fancy guitar work and cigarette lighter love songs. 3 Stars Out of 5
Download: "Last Hour", "Run" "Interface" (if you want to relive your Jr. High boner); Skip: "Flower Man"

What Made Milwaukee Famous, What Doesn't Kill Us- But they're not from Milwaukee, they're from Austin. Hmmm....either way these are some of the catchiest rock songs you'll hear all year. No shoe gazing allowed. 4 Stars Out of 5
Download: "Sultan", "Cheap Wine"; Skip: "To Each His Own"

Buckcherry, Black Butterfly - After 3 solid, underrated glam rock albums, Buckcherry rushes out to capitalize on the success of 'Crazy Bitch' and releases a crazy bad album. The grit, swagger and bluesy overtones of their prior releases have been replaced with a neutered, radio pandering, and wholly generic sound. Two good songs remind me of what could have been. The rest smell like b.o. 2 Stars Out of 5
Download: "A Child Called It", "Rescue Me"; Skip: "Talk to Me"

*Speaking of shameless pandering, the wife and I (along with Camella the cat) have launched a personal homepage/blog called The Handfelt Happy Hour, located here. It's all pretty harmless, mundane stuff, intended as a way of getting out of calling my mother as much. But where else can you delve deep into the life of 'the real Chaim Witz' and find out what I ate for dinner last weekend, or what our cat has to say about the latest trends in squirrel watching? Fascinating stuff for sure.

A Thunder Matt Movie Minute

July 02, 2008 | Comments (0) | by Chaim Witz

Wall E

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: The year is 2700. WALL*E, a robot, spends every day doing what he was made for. But soon, he will discover what he was meant for.

In theatres: June 27

Review: I don't have children (gay? sterile? both?), so I don't see a lot of kids movies. I didn't hop aboard the Pixar bandwagon until last year's Ratatouille. Toy Story? Never seen it. The Incredibles? Nope. Finding Nemo? I'm more likely to find Hideo Nomo. But after Ratatouille knocked my dick in the dirt (way to include that phrase in a kid's movie review asshole), I hopped aboard the Pixar bandwagon and went into this space-age Short Circuit knockoff with high hopes. It did not disappoint. Wall E is a kids movie that you don't need to feel like a child molester for going to without kids. Wearing a dark trench coat. Full of candy. Reeking of rum and desperation.

Wall E is the last remaining robot on Earth. Humans abandoned the planet years ago, when it became an uninhabitable trash heap*. Wall E himself was the brainchild of Buy N Large corporation, the same company that owns the spaceship that all humans now circle the solar system in. (There are a bunch of non-functioning Wall E's rusting away back on earth, but he's the only one that still works). Wall E still goes about his daily routine, compressing garbage into square little heaps, his only friend being a cockroach. Everything soon changes when one of BNL's probes, named Eve, is sent to Earth and finds plant life and of course Wall E, bringing both back to the Mothership, where all the humans have become so fat and lazy that they can't even move out of their motorized chairs. Think The Jetsons, if they were force fed Old Country Buffet for every meal.

Equal parts ET, 2001 Space Odyseey and Idocracy, Wall E is a visual marvel. The first 45 minutes are entirely dialogue free, which is a fairly ballsy move for any movie, much less one targeted at kids. That said, those 45 minutes were more immersing than anything I've seen on screen all year.

Wall E isn't the funniest movie of the year. There are more chuckles and knowing smiles than guffaws. Once the action moves to the spaceship, it occasionally loses some of it's unique sensibilities. Even so, it entertains on multiple levels throughout, even working in subtle themes regarding the environment, corporate entities, and even laziness, without ever seeming preachy. At it's robotic core, it's a simple (and effective) love story with a positive message that's got the vintage charm of a record player along with all the cool features of an iPod.

Thunder Matt Rating: 4 Non-Functioning Remote Controls Out of 5

*"Oh my God," cry the Cherokee-driving, conservative soccer moms. "A positive 'green' message? Liberal brainwashing!"

Wanted

In theatres: June 27

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: "Wanted" tells the tale of one apathetic nobody's transformation into an unparalleled enforcer of justice.

Review: Wanted is the cinematic equivalent of doing a line of coke off of a stripper's ass, dumping 3 packs of Pop Rocks in your mouth, washing them down with a 2 liter of Jolt Cola, and then proceeding to rip off your shirt and shocking yourself with a defibrillator. Good, clean fun for the whole family.

Wanted tells the story of Wesley Gibson, a tired and bored corporate lackey, stuck in dead end job with a nagging girlfriend who has a taste for his co-workers love gun. Wesley can't even muster up the energy to let that bother him. Then one day, while minding his own business at a convenience store, he is approached by a tattooed and gun toting Mrs. Pitt, who tells him that he's an assassin. If I had a nickel for every time that happened to me at the 7-11**...Anyway, one thing leads to another, which leads to a gun battle, which leads to a high speed chase through downtown Chicago, which logically, leads to Angelina adopting more African babies.

The plot is pretty ridiculous to watch unfold and even more so to try to explain. Suffice it to say, Wesley, like his father before him, joins a fraternity of assassins called...wait for it...The Fraternity, led by of all people, Morgan Freeman. Cue the training montages. Even more preposterous is how the victims are chosen. The Loom of Fate. That's right, a loom, just like the Amish use! Once deemed ready, Wesley, with the help of Fox (Jolie) has to find and kill the man that murdered his father.

Despite plot holes big enough to drive Governor Schwarzenegger's Hummer through, Wanted has a 'I don't give a shit what you think' attitude which is oddly endearing. Taken for what it is, which is a dopey, over-the-top, candy-coated, 'check your brain at the door' action flick, it's bloody brilliant. The action is all of the 'yeah right' variety, but is done with such gleeful abandon that you find yourself chuckling not at it, but with it. Curving (!) bullets, knife fights, high speed train wrecks on mountaintops, bosses getting what's coming to em', Morgan Freeman dropping F bombs, and a naked Angelina Jolie, soaking wet. I'd like to go up for seconds, please and thank you.

Thunder Matt Rating: 3.5 Baby Shiloh's Out of 5

**I would have zero cents.

Hancock

In Theatres: July 2

IMDB Cribbed Synopsis: A hard-living superhero who has fallen out of favor with the public enters into a questionable relationship with the wife of the public relations professional who's trying to repair his image.

Review: In this post-9/11 world that we live in, America needs a superhero. No, not Spiderman or Batman. I'm talking about a man of the people. Someone not afraid to get shitfaced and sleep on a bench. Someone who hates children and doesn't shave for days. Someone not unlike Saloon bartender The Hundley. Unfortunately for him (and fortunately for America), Hundley's screen test didn't go so well (see: unwilling to perform sexual favors on the casting director, a cologne-drenched Swede named Phillip), so they offered the role to Will Smith.

The idea of a flawed, uncooperative superhero without a secret identity is fairly unique in this day and age when every summer weekend brings about the launch of another Marvel superhero franchise. My Super Ex-Girlfriend aside (out of sight, out of mind), this is a fairly intriguing concept for this genre.

And for the first half of the film, it works. Will Smith, a black man that white people can all agree on, is cast against type as the drunk, angry and thoroughly unwilling superhero. Unlike, say, Tom Hanks, Will is able to pull it off with gusto and aplomb. Cursing at children and fat people, swilling whiskey from a bottle and causing millions of dollars of damage to the city of Los Angeles doesn't exactly endear him to the public. (Although he did capture my heart when he scolds a rather obese gawker, telling him, "McDonalds done fucked you up.")

Enter Jason Bateman as Ray Embry, a struggling PR executive, who meets Hancock courtesy of a hilarious train incident and decides to take Hancock on as a client in an effort to revamp his image and kickstart his struggling PR career. This involves some voluntary time in the Big House (even though he could easily escape whenever he wants) and lessons in common superhero etiquette.

Unfortunately, this bastardly behavior can only sustain the film for so long, so about halfway through, a 'twist' is introduced. The twist seems fairly contrived, and from that point on the tone goes from dark comedy to more standard superhero fare, with all previous traces of uniqueness left behind in the bottom of Hancock's whiskey bottle. A whole movie's worth of backstory is crammed into one five-minute piece of expository dialogue, and with no real nemeses to go up against, the ending feels tacked on, as if the writers couldn't really think of anywhere else for the story to go.

Jason Bateman is a great and Charlize Theron is fine (and by fine, I mean it in the sense of 'Damn girl, you lookin' fine') as his uptight wife, but all the good acting in the world can't save a muddled script. And a note to the writers: The first one or two times Hancock lands on the ground and breaks up the concrete? Cool. The 20th time? Ok, we get it.

Hancock didn't ask to be a superhero; he just wants to be average. In the end, the movie achieves exactly what he wished for.

Thunder Matt Rating: 3 Copies of 'Big Willie Style' Out of 5